> Thanks for the Supreme Court coverage, Mike. I do hope the last line of your
> article was a typo, or else Scalia's knowledge of English grammar is as bad as
> his knowledge of Constitutional law. :-)
Oops. Fixed the typo, thanks for the catch!
> The court's case has no simple answer and must be watched carefully - especially
> how narrowly or broadly the decision will be constructed. Either way, the
> precedent it creates may well be more important than the decision itself.
Agreed. I find the "Vulcan" conversation to be the most enlightening.
Of course, much of the discourse isn't about defining the virtual
crimes so much as it is defining whether or not the courts have the
right to intervene.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CAR-PGa" group.
To post to this group, send email to car-pga@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to car-pga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/car-pga?hl=en.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.