Re: [CAR-PGa] Breyer dissent

Given the easy access to the internet that most children have through a huge variety of conduits, parents would be wise to accept that current legislation will do little to keep pornography out of their children's hands if they choose to seek it out.

As always, communication with and monitoring of your children will do more than any legislation.

Rick Smathers

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Cardwell <hippogriffpub@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Paul Cardwell <hippogriffpub@yahoo.com>
To: car-pga@googlegroups.com <car-pga@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [CAR-PGa] Breyer dissent
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:39:50 -0700 (PDT)

While the corporate media is ignoring the implication of Justice Breyer's dissent in the video game case, the "underground" (online) media is not.  An excellent article on this by Sarah Jaffe is on today's (29 Je 2011) AlterNet.  Get it while it's hot, these articles don't stay up long and it is often difficult to recover them after a week or so.

Like Breyer and Jaffe, just for the record, I am not advocating porn, although the Supreme Court decisions have so far held that porn must be sexual and nudity in anthropology (and our games) is not otherwise pornography.

Paul Cardwell
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CAR-PGa: The Committee for the Advancement of Role-Playing Games" group.
To post to this group, send email to car-pga@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to car-pga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/car-pga?hl=en.

Category: 0 comments

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.